Cases 31 - 40 of 159
Kaufman v. CDCR et al
as 4:2022cv05043
Plaintiff:
Joel David Kaufman
Defendant:
CDCR, Pacific Forensic Psychology Associates doing business as Sharper Future, Kathleen Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Allison et al
as 3:2022cv04838
Plaintiff:
Peter Wilson
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Trent Allen, Captain Lomeli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Newsome et al
as 4:2022cv04482
Plaintiff:
Arthur Duane Jackson
Defendant:
Mayor Gavin Newsome, Ron Davis, Ron Broomfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mackey
as 5:2022cv04341
Plaintiff:
Michael Mackey
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield, R. Reseler, Ron Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moreno v. Allison
as 3:2022cv03612
Petitioner:
Jesse Moreno
Respondent:
Secretary Kathleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rodriguez v. CDCR
as 4:2022cv03109
Petitioner:
Jorge Rodriguez
Respondent:
CDCR and Kathleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Uhuru v. Benavidez et al
as 3:2022cv02658
Plaintiff:
Kohen Diallo Uhuru
Defendant:
J. Benavidez, J. Garry, Secretary Kathleen Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ulep v. Allison et al
as 4:2022cv02617
Plaintiff:
Alex Ulep
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Ralph Diaz, Ronald Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Uhuru v. Benavidez
as 4:2022cv02435
Petitioner:
Kohen Diallo Uhuru, Diallo Dynomite and Diallo Earl Uhuru
Respondent:
Warden, J. Benavidez, Robert Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dixon v. Diaz et al
as 4:2022cv02322
Plaintiff:
Gregory J. Dixon
Defendant:
Ralph Diaz, DIrector CDCR Kathleen Allison, Warden Ron Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
