Cases 41 - 50 of 3,189
S. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01157
Plaintiff:
K. S.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Baker v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2024cv01112
Plaintiff:
Patty K. Baker
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
D. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01006
Plaintiff:
K. D.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Poe v. Cogliati
as 5:2024cv00936
Plaintiff:
Brian Sheldon Poe
Defendant:
Syda K. Cogliati
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
P. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00772
Plaintiff:
minor K. P.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc., Rasier LLC and Doe Defendants 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Brown v. Kennison, et al
as 3:2024cv00824
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Brown
Defendant:
D. Kennison, K. Coffman, E. Love and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
J. et al v. Coopersurgical, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00693
Plaintiff:
I. J. and K. L.
Defendant:
Coopersurgical, Inc. and The Cooper Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Cole et al v. Johns et al
as 3:2024cv00598
Plaintiff:
Michael Cole, Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc. and Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Timothy E. Johns, James A. Ajello, Scott W. H. Seu and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
