Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California
Cases 41 - 50 of 2,479
P. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00333
Plaintiff: R. P.
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00108
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kallaus v. Johns et al
as 3:2023cv06627
Plaintiff: Patrick Kallaus
Defendant: Timothy E. Johns, James A. Ajello, Shelee M. T. Kimura and others
Calderon v. Covello We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv06560
Petitioner: Juan Carlos Calderon
Respondent: P Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vorpahl v. Labe et al
as 4:2023cv06557
Plaintiff: Larry Vorpahl
Defendant: James P Labe, Christopher M. Mathieu, Sajal K. Srivastava and others
Orejon et al v. Alpha Tech Plumbing, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv06510
Plaintiff: Omar P Orejon, Adrian P Orejon and Gustavo Ramos
Defendant: Alpha Tech Plumbing, Inc., David Dorado and Flor Bravo Dorado
P. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv06357
Plaintiff: A. P.
Defendant: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Rasier LLC and Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Reaud v. Facebook, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv06329
Plaintiff: Alfred P. Reaud and Alfred Pedro Reaud
Defendant: Facebook Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Khan v. Madsen et al
as 5:2023cv06141
Plaintiff: Muhammad Khan
Defendant: Haley Madsen, Arlene Stephens, J. A. Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lake v. Rowdy Beverage Inc
as 3:2023cv06114
Plaintiff: Gerald P Lake
Defendant: Rowdy Beverage Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?