Cases 71 - 80 of 725
Pino et al v. Birch Benders, LLC
as 3:2022cv02194
Plaintiff:
Brittney Pino and Terri Gamino
Defendant:
Birch Benders, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv02163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
C. et al v. County of Alameda et al
as 4:2022cv01817
Plaintiff:
K. P., Terri Williams Park and K. C.
Defendant:
County of Alameda, Gregory J. Ahern, Karyn L. Tribble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frink, et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2022cv01232
Plaintiff:
Carl Anthony Frink, Danny L. Jordan, Debra J. Holcomb and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ansong Jnr. v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 3:2022cv01109
Plaintiff:
Yaw Ofosu Ansong Jnr.
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Terri Robinson
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Rothman v. Rothman
as 4:2022cv00910
Petitioner:
Martin Terry Rothman
Respondent:
Ailsa Mhorag Helen Rothman
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00215
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
