Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv04831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Hiscox Syndicates Limited v. Paper Bird, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv04033
Plaintiff:
Hiscox Syndicates Limited
Defendant:
Paper Bird, Inc., Samuel Bankman-Fried, Nishad Singh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Lu v. Enigma MPC, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv02152
Plaintiff:
Bin Lu
Defendant:
Enigma MPC, Inc., Guy Zyskind and Can Kisagun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Antetokounmpo v. Zellner et al
as 4:2022cv03412
Plaintiff:
GIANNIS ANTETOKOUNMPO
Defendant:
Sarah Zellner, Shalicia E Hurns, Brittney Snider and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Luong v. MICHAEL CANNING d/b/a CANNING PROPERTIES GROUP et al
as 5:2020cv03998
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, inclusive and MICHAEL CANNING d/b/a CANNING PROPERTIES GROUP
Plaintiff:
Quang-Tuan Luong
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Luong v. Sothebys International Realty, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv03999
Defendant:
SOTHEBYS INTERNATIONAL REALTY, INC, Does 1 through 10, inclusive, MICHAEL CANNING d/b/a CANNING PROPERTIES GROUP and others
Plaintiff:
Quang-Tuan Luong
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Gidding v. Fitz et al
as 4:2020mc80060
Petitioner:
Can D. Gidding, John Gidding and Can Danny Gidding
Respondent:
Timothy W. Fitz, Four Year Gap, LLC, Kelly E. Fitz and others
Canning et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv04230
Plaintiff:
Shirley Canning and Richard Canning
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Can't Live Without It, LLC v. ETS Express Inc
as 3:2017mc80144
Plaintiff:
Can't Live Without It, LLC
Defendant:
ETS Express Inc
Movant:
Sarah Kauss
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
