Cases 1 - 10 of 98
Bonilla v. Clay et al
as 4:2024cv04569
Defendant:
Robert A Gusman, Jeffrey A. Thompson, Clair Maier and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dawson
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dawson v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2023cv01927
Plaintiff:
Jesse Dawson
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davis-Murray v. State of California, et al
as 3:2023cv01816
Plaintiff:
Blake Davis-Murray
Defendant:
State of California, Hercules Police Department, Pinole Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dilnessa v. Caraway et al
as 4:2023cv00886
Plaintiff:
Ayalneh Dilnessa
Defendant:
Corie T. Caraway, E. Ryan Lamb, Michael Ramsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv05347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bonilla v. Smith et al
as 4:2022cv05186
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
William E. Smith, Quentin L. Smith and Floy E. Dawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Dawson et al
as 4:2022cv05121
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Floy E. Dawson and U.S. Attorney Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Broomfield
as 5:2022cv01316
Petitioner:
Kenneth Dean Dawson
Respondent:
Unknown and Ronald J. Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
