Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Ledezma v. Hill
as 5:2024cv03393
Respondent:
James Hill
Petitioner:
Joe Ledezma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Melody v. Hill
as 3:2023cv06210
Defendant:
sean melody and Warden James Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
v. Melody et al
as 3:2023mc80308
Defendant:
Sean Melody and Warden James Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Quair III v. Hill
as 4:2022cv04692
Petitioner:
David Sabino Quair III
Respondent:
San Mateo Superior Court
Defendant:
James Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lowe v. Case Records Staff et al
as 4:2022cv00683
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Kevin Lowe
Defendant:
Case Records Staff and James Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rachimi v. Silver Lake Group, L.L.C. et al
as 4:2020cv03766
Plaintiff:
Infinity Capital Markets Limited, Sam Rachimi, FNY Managed Accounts, LLC and others
Defendant:
Raymond Svider, BC Partners LLP, Justin Bateman and others
Petitioner:
Sergey Parakhnevich, James Hill and Steven Connor
FNY Partners Fund LP et al v. BC Partners LLP et al
as 4:2020cv03741
Plaintiff:
Infinity Capital Markets Limited, FNY Managed Accounts LLC and FNY Partners Fund LP
Defendant:
Raymond Svider, BC Partners LLP, Justin Bateman and others
Petitioner:
Sam Rachimi, Sergey Parakhnevich, Steven Connor and others
James Hill v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2020cv03443
Plaintiff:
James Hill
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Koivisto v. Gill et al
as 3:2020cv02710
Defendant:
Teddey, Zack, Dick Richard Jenumues and others
Plaintiff:
Tauno A. Koivisto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Silver Lake Group, L.L.C. et al
as 4:2020cv02341
Defendant:
BC Partners LLP, Raymond Svider, Justin Bateman and others
Plaintiff:
James Hill
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
