Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California
Cases 1 - 10 of 973
Hohmann v. St. Andre
as 1:2024cv03597
Petitioner: Robert C. Hohmann
Respondent: Warden Rob St. Andre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mrozek v. Eaton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv03324
Plaintiff: Bradley James Mrozek
Defendant: Warden Patrick Eaton, CDCR Director Ron Broomfield, Voc. Instructor T. Ismans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatchett v. Clark
as 4:2024cv03246
Petitioner: Cecil Jerome Hatchett
Respondent: Warden Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Standley v. Pfeiffer
as 3:2024cv03081
Petitioner: Curtis R Standley
Respondent: Warden Christian Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gomez v. Andes
as 3:2024cv03032
Petitioner: John B. Gomez
Respondent: Warden Chance Andes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Borla
as 3:2024cv02811
Petitioner: Webster Lee
Respondent: Warden Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia Nava v. Lundy
as 3:2024cv02808
Petitioner: Juan L. Garcia Nava
Respondent: Warden Leanna Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garner v. SVSP Warden et al
as 3:2024cv02751
Plaintiff: Randall James Garner
Defendant: SVSP Warden and C/O M. Avila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Nieto v. Allison et al
as 4:2024cv02628
Plaintiff: Deputy D.A. Michael Nieto
Defendant: Warden Kathleen Allison, Hernandez, Jimenez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flournoy v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv02577
Plaintiff: James Flournoy
Defendant: Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?