Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Nguyen v. Nguyen
as 3:2024cv02068
Plaintiff:
huynh xuan nguyen
Defendant:
Nguyen thanh tam thi and Tam Thi Thanh Nguyen doing business as Home Furniture Design Mfg.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Run The World Inc. v. Jiang
as 3:2023cv03130
Plaintiff:
Run The World Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Xuan Jiang
Counter Defendant:
Xiaoyin Qu, Connie Chan, AH Capital Management, LLC doing business as Andreessen Horowitz (A16Z) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1361
HP Inc. et al v. WISETA et al
as 4:2023cv00344
Defendant:
WISETA, ZHAICOLOR, MOOHO and others
Plaintiff:
HP Inc. and Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02954
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Saldivar et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al
as 3:2020cv07283
Plaintiff:
SONILA MELOTIK, DEBORAH E. HARLE, BERNARD L. HARRISON and others
Defendant:
GROCERY OUTLET, PFIZER INC., INCORRECTLY DESIGNATED AS DOE 4, SAFEWAY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv04900
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
