Cases 151 - 160 of 4,080
Rico v. Holbrook et al
as 3:2022cv00701
Petitioner:
Aaron David Rico, III
Respondent:
David Holbrook and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bolin v. State of California
as 3:2022cv00831
Petitioner:
Paul C. Bolin
Respondent:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Price v. Montgomery et al
as 3:2022cv00912
Petitioner:
Marcel D. Price
Respondent:
Warren L. Montgomery and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Radloff v. Pallares
as 3:2022cv00746
Petitioner:
Jamie Nichole Radloff
Respondent:
Michael Pallares
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunbar v. Campos
as 3:2022cv00875
Petitioner:
Michael Ladre Dunbar
Respondent:
Raul Campos, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jones v. Gore et al
as 3:2022cv00622
Petitioner:
Isaac Jones, Jr.
Respondent:
William Gore and Robert Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Barnes
as 3:2022cv00640
Petitioner:
Isaac Jones, Jr.
Respondent:
Don Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Muro v. Gipson et al
as 3:2022cv00550
Petitioner:
Antonio Muro
Respondent:
Connie Gipson and Rob Bonto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Billie v. Gibson et al
as 3:2022cv00778
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Billie
Respondent:
Connie Gibson and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jacome v. Hill et al
as 3:2022cv00546
Petitioner:
Alexander Jacome
Respondent:
James S. Hill, Gavin Newsom and Kathleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
