Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Emas v. Roman
as 3:2023cv02194
Petitioner:
Nicholas Emas
Respondent:
Jaime I. Roman
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Maccord v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv01087
Petitioner:
Donald Maccord
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Espenesa v. United States of America
as 3:2019cv02415
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
William Espenesa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chavarria v. United States of America
as 3:2019cv00431
Petitioner:
Karla Vanessa Chavarria
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Montejo-Perez v. United States Magistrate Judge for the Southern District of California et al
as 3:2018cv01983
Defendant:
United States Magistrate Judge for the Southern District of California and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Abraham Montejo-Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 hc
Alexandra Vazquez v. United States of America
as 3:2018cv01916
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Alexandra Vazquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Barrientos-Ramirez v. United States Of America
as 3:2017cv00240
Petitioner:
Claudio Barrientos-Ramirez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ramon Martinez Banuelos Jr. v. United States of America et al
as 3:2017cv00027
Plaintiff:
Ramon Martinez Banuelos, Jr
Defendant:
United States of America and Langford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Michael Patrick Whalen v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv01734
Plaintiff:
Michael Patrick Whalen
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Nowling v. United States of America
as 3:2015cv00766
Petitioner:
Keith Nowling
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
