Cases 51 - 60 of 617
Garcia v. Pollard et al
as 3:2022cv01709
Plaintiff:
Abel J. Garcia
Defendant:
M. Pollard, M. Carrillo, Y. Abdi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Bouria et al
as 3:2022cv01656
Plaintiff:
Marcus B. Fields
Defendant:
Pfizer C.E.O. Albert Bouria and John or Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Salmen v. Bryant et al
as 3:2022cv01508
Plaintiff:
Justin Salmen
Defendant:
Bryant, Doe and Saenz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Robert Presley Detention Center et al
as 3:2022cv01430
Plaintiff:
David Roberts
Defendant:
Robert Presley Detention Center, John Doe and County of Riverside
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Chase Bank et al
as 3:2022cv01320
Plaintiff:
David Bryan Turner, Jr.
Defendant:
Chase Bank and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Avery v. McCourt et al
as 3:2022cv01144
Plaintiff:
Kyle Avery
Defendant:
Dan McCourt, H. Chaudhry, S. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2022cv01131
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewayne Allen
Defendant:
Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Figueroa v. Clark et al
as 3:2022cv01030
Plaintiff:
Ruben Figueroa
Defendant:
Ken Clark, Paul Silva, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Bennett et al
as 3:2022cv01011
Plaintiff:
Kenyatta Quinn Mitchell
Defendant:
Paul Bennett and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Agular et al
as 3:2022cv00979
Plaintiff:
William H. Thomas
Defendant:
Agular, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
