Contract Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of California
Cases 1 - 10 of 193
The United States of America et al v. Heffler Contracting Group et al
as 3:2024cv00915
Plaintiff: The United States of America and BKM OfficeWorks, LLC
Defendant: Heffler Contracting Group, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 bc Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America et al v. IPI Construction et al
as 3:2024cv00317
Plaintiff: United States of America and ISEC, Incorporated
Defendant: IPI Construction, The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company and Does 1 through 100
Cross Defendant: The Western Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America, for the use and benefit of TL Scanlan Construction, Inc. et al v. Portillo Concrete, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv02020
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the use and benefit of TL Scanlan Construction, Inc. and TL Scanlan Construction, Inc.
Defendant: Portillo Concrete, Inc. and The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Macovichuk v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv01812
Plaintiff: Michael Macovichuk
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
United States of America for the use and benefit of Zuheir, Inc. v. Straub Construction, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00957
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of Zuheir, Inc. a California corporation doing business as Comprehensive Glassworks, Inc.
Defendant: Straub Construction, Inc. and Western Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Bonds of contractors of public buildings
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of J.A. Placek Construction Co. et al v. Hal Hays Construction, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00472
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of J.A. Placek Construction Co. and J.A. Placek Construction Co.
Defendant: Hal Hays Construction, Inc., Western Surety Company and American Contractors Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of ideal Manufacturing, Inc. v. West Point Contractors, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00732
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: West Point Contractors, Inc., West Point Utilities, LLC, Harco National Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
BAE Systems San Diego Ship Repair Inc. v. The United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00515
Plaintiff: BAE Systems San Diego Ship Repair Inc.
Defendant: The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
United States of America, for the use and benefit of Tradesman International, LLC v. Willkom, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01946
Plaintiff: Tradesman International, LLC and United States of America, for the use and benefit of Tradesman International, LLC
Defendant: Willkom, Inc. and Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
United States of America for The Use and Benefit of Facilities Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. Heffler Contracting Group et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv01414
Plaintiff: United States of America for The Use and Benefit of Facilities Mechanical Contractors, Inc. and United States of America
Defendant: Alliant Insurance Services, Inc., Does 1 Through 10, Heffler Contracting Group and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Bonds of contractors of public buildings
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?