Cases 71 - 80 of 111
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Spikes v. Farkas Store Fixtures Inc et al
as 3:2008cv00708
Plaintiff:
Karel Spikes
Defendant:
Farkas Store Fixtures Inc, Chung Lee and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Spikes v. Douglas et al
as 3:2008cv00690
Plaintiff:
Karel Spikes
Defendant:
Glenn Douglas, Lee Family Trust and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Spikes v. Arias et al
as 3:2008cv00657
Plaintiff:
Karel Spikes, .
Defendant:
Lou Arias, Paradise Creek Holding Corporation and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Rogozienski v. Allen et al
as 3:2008cv00316
Plaintiff:
Frank E Rogozienski
Defendant:
James D Allen, S Michael Love and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Outerbridge Access Association et al v. S.B. Restaurant Co. et al
as 3:2008cv00121
Plaintiff:
Outerbridge Access Association and Diane Cross
Defendant:
S.B. Restaurant Co., Sprouts Farmers Market, LLC, Sport Chalet, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Spikes v. TNT Auto Sales, Inc et al
as 3:2007cv02318
Plaintiff:
Karel Spikes
Defendant:
TNT Auto Sales, Inc, Troy Richardson, Marilyn Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
