Cases 131 - 140 of 12,101
Blake v. Moreno
as 3:2023cv02310
Plaintiff:
Tom Blake
Defendant:
N. Moreno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyler v. Doctor Lu
as 3:2023cv02284
Plaintiff:
Claudie Tyler
Defendant:
Doctor Lu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Imperial, San Diego, and Alameda County Superior Courts
as 3:2023cv02273
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Imperial, San Diego, and Alameda County Superior Courts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyler v. C-Yard Sgt Banulos
as 3:2023cv02278
Plaintiff:
Claudie Tyler
Defendant:
C-Yard Sgt Banulos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02249
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Mills v. San Diego County Medical Dept et al
as 3:2023cv02248
Plaintiff:
David Ray Mills
Defendant:
San Diego County Medical Dept, ARJIS 6608 and CMO Doctor Psych
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Winslow v. Macomber et al
as 3:2023cv02270
Petitioner:
Kellen B. Winslow, II
Respondent:
Jeffery McComber and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bibbs et al v. Doe 2
as 3:2023cv02271
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Bibbs and John Doe 1
Defendant:
John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Office of Internal Affairs (OIA)
as 3:2023cv02242
Petitioner:
Wayne Elijah Jones
Respondent:
Office of Internal Affairs (OIA)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. The People et al
as 3:2023cv02243
Petitioner:
Wayne Elijah Jones
Respondent:
The People and D.A. Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
