Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00492
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holmes v. San Diego Sheriff Department et al
as 3:2023cv01329
Plaintiff:
Andre Lamar Holmes
Defendant:
San Diego Sheriff Department, South Bay Detention Facility and Alvarado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. Holm et al
as 3:2023cv00854
Plaintiff:
Randy Eugene Haynes
Defendant:
Holm, Ferguson, Roa Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamotte v. State of California et al
as 3:2022cv01160
Plaintiff:
James Dondi Lamotte
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Matthew Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
George v. United States et al
as 3:2019cv01557
Defendant:
Michael Garcia, Abigail Dillon, Bonnie Dumanis and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
White v. Michigan, State of et al
as 3:2018cv00438
Plaintiff:
Kala B. White
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, State of Michigan Department of State Police, State of Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Dugan et al
as 3:2016cv02687
Plaintiff:
Henry James Holmes
Defendant:
Becky L. Dugan, Cynthia Brewer, Donna Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Forman et al
as 3:2016cv02658
Plaintiff:
Henry James Holmes
Defendant:
Robert Forman, Riverside Police Dept, Heath Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Estock et al
as 3:2016cv02458
Plaintiff:
Charles Holmes
Defendant:
Estock, Bal, S. Chaiken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burton v. Rocha et al
as 3:2016cv01664
Plaintiff:
E.W. Burton
Defendant:
C.T. Rocha, Bonnie Duman, Maria Hanna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
