Cases 1 - 10 of 301
Rutherford v. Steadman et al
as 3:2024cv01023
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Jovon Rutherford
Defendant:
S. Steadman, P. Wingo, B. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Meza et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Amalia L Meza, Charles G Rogers, Esteban Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01481
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Egan v. Weinreb et al
as 3:2023cv01307
Petitioner:
Michael P. Egan
Respondent:
Brad A. Weinreb and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGhee v. CDCR et al
as 3:2023cv01188
Plaintiff:
Harold J. McGhee
Defendant:
CDCR, El Centro Regional Medical Center, Leah P. Farinas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Cates et al
as 3:2023cv00415
Plaintiff:
Sedric Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
Brian Cates, Pat Horn, R. Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Duran et al
as 3:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Merrick Moore
Defendant:
J. J. Duran, D. Manquero, J. Valencia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Hopper v. Madden, et al.
as 3:2022cv01909
Petitioner:
Douglas Lee Hopper
Respondent:
Brian Kibler, Raymond Madden, A. Palacios and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Landeros et al
as 3:2022cv01602
Plaintiff:
Derrick Butler
Defendant:
P. Landeros, Lopez, R. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Chappell v. McDowell et al
as 3:2022cv01241
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Chappell
Defendant:
N. McDowell, S. Lopez, N. Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
