Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Quinn v. Pollard et al
as 3:2023cv01494
Plaintiff:
Gregory W. Quinn
Defendant:
Marcus A. Pollard, Rico Matthews and F. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Bennett et al
as 3:2022cv01011
Plaintiff:
Kenyatta Quinn Mitchell
Defendant:
Paul Bennett and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. CDCR Director et al
as 3:2021cv01261
Petitioner:
Kenyatta Quinn Mitchell
Respondent:
CDCR Director and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mitchell v. Chula Vista Parole
as 3:2020cv00919
Defendant:
Chula Vista Parole
Plaintiff:
Kenyatta Quinn Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Mitchell v. Director of the California Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv00697
Petitioner:
Kenyatta Quinn Mitchell
Respondent:
Director of the California Department of Corrections, . and Xavier Beccera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kherdeen v. Obabma et al
as 3:2016cv02304
Plaintiff:
Mazen J. Kherdeen
Defendant:
Barack Hussein Obabma, U.S. Government Executive Branch, John Hickenlooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tombs v. Paramo, et al
as 3:2013cv01869
Plaintiff:
Larry E. Tombs
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo, Whity, Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. California Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2013cv00480
Petitioner:
Kenyatta Quinn Mitchell
Respondent:
California Correctional Institution and Attorneys for the Prosecution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Quinn v. Singh et al
as 3:2011cv01085
Plaintiff:
Gregory Wayne Quinn
Defendant:
D Singh, F Rodriguez and B Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. Tomberlin et al
as 3:2010cv00596
Plaintiff:
Wesley A Pearson
Defendant:
John M Tomberlin, Kit Davis, Williams Figueroa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
