Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Ewing v. K2 Property Development, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00678
Plaintiff:
Anton Ewing
Defendant:
K2 Property Development, LLC, Daniel Klein , DOES 1 through 100 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Ewing v. 29 Prime, Inc et al
as 3:2015cv01850
Plaintiff:
Anton Ewing
Defendant:
29 Prime, Inc, Russell Wallace, Tony Redman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Ewing v. Flora et al
as 3:2014cv02925
Plaintiff:
Anton A. Ewing
Defendant:
Phillip A. Flora , Every Data, Inc. , Every Data and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lycurgan, Inc. v. Rood et al
as 3:2013cv02504
Plaintiff:
Lycurgan, Inc.
Defendant:
Richard R. Rood, Jr. , Blood Brothers Armory, LLC , Vision Armory and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Tonini v. Mandarich Law Group, LLP et al
as 3:2012cv00637
Plaintiff:
Richard B. Tonini
Defendant:
Mandarich Law Group, LLP, Cach, LLC and John Doe(s) 1 thru 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Freitag v. Downtown Partnership Clean + Safe et al
as 3:2012cv00203
Plaintiff:
John Freitag
Defendant:
Downtown Partnership Clean + Safe, J. Wiggins and John Doe(s) 1, 2, 3, 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ISIS Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Drug Royalty Corporation, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv01136
Plaintiff:
ISIS Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant:
Drug Royalty Corporation, Inc., Drug Royalty USA, Inc., Drug Royalty Trust 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
