Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Greenbroz, Inc. v. Laeger Built, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv02946
Plaintiff:
Greenbroz, Inc.
Defendant:
Laeger Built, LLC , Jeffery Laeger and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Comana Company, Inc v. Rainey et al
as 3:2016cv02881
Plaintiff:
Comana Company, Inc
Defendant:
Jeffery Rainey, Maria Rainey and Does I-X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Monarrez v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2016cv02712
Plaintiff:
Ezequiel Monarrez
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Jeffery Beard, C. Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
France v. Brown et al
as 3:2016cv02398
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen France
Defendant:
Jerry Brown, Jeffery Beard, (Jose) Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02139
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kane v. Gomez et al
as 3:2016cv01804
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Elias Kane
Defendant:
R. Gomez, Ramsey, R.J. Donovan State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanchard v. San Diego, County of et al
as 3:2016cv01783
Plaintiff:
Richard Blanchard
Defendant:
San Diego, County of , John Doe Medical Corporation, John Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaddis et al v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
as 3:2016cv00591
Plaintiff:
Jeffery T Gaddis and Catherine Gaddis
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hernandez v. Beard et al
as 3:2016cv00470
Petitioner:
Francisco Rene Hernandez
Respondent:
Jeffery Beard and Kamala D. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kane v. R.J. Donovan State Prison
as 3:2016cv00111
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Elias Kane
Defendant:
R.J. Donovan State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
