Cases 21 - 30 of 908
Rishah v. Sharp Grossmont Hospital et al
as 3:2022cv00415
Plaintiff:
Amabelle Rishah
Defendant:
Sharp Grossmont Hospital, United States of America and DOES 1-24
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 mm Removal- Medical Malpractice
Ruiz v. Scripps Health et al
as 3:2022cv00233
Plaintiff:
Romulo A. Ruiz
Defendant:
Scripps Health, Scripps Mercy Hospital, Scripps Memorial Hospital La Jolla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Appointment of Surgeon General
Whaley et al v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01985
Plaintiff:
Andrew Whaley and Magdalena Whaley
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Does 1 through 100, inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pl
Hucker v. Daub et al
as 3:2021cv00577
Defendant:
Christopher Daub, Antje Moran, Seneca Sharp and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Robert Hucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Colbath v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00120
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp and Merck & Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Colbath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Valenzuela v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
as 3:2020cv02455
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
Mary Valenzuela
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
as 3:2020cv02448
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
Michael Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl
Polus v. Sharp Healthcare et al
as 3:2020cv02253
Defendant:
Does 1 through 50, Edgar M. Bulloch, Sharp Healthcare and others
Plaintiff:
Jawaher Polus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 mm
Anselmo v. Amylin Pharmaceuticals, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv02150
Plaintiff:
Vito Anselmo
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. and Amylin Pharmaceuticals, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl
Lindsey v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp,
as 3:2020cv02105
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
Mulqueen Lindsey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
