Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Guadarrama v. The State of California et al
as 3:2008cv00078
Plaintiff:
Jorge Guadarrama
Defendant:
The State of California, James E Tilton, L E Scribner and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Securities & Exchange Commission v. C E C Industries Corporation et al
as 3:2008mc00051
Plaintiff:
Securities & Exchange Commission
Defendant:
C E C Industries Corporation, Gerald Levine and Marie A Levine
Gieck v. Canada et al
as 3:2007cv02083
Plaintiff:
Dennis Michael Gieck
Defendant:
L Canada, Thomas Kemp, A. T. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Levine v. Citi Bank
as 3:2007cv02032
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey D. Levine
Defendant:
Citi Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Pride v. Correa et al
as 3:2007cv01382
Plaintiff:
David Codell Pride, JR
Defendant:
M Correa, Levin, T Ochoa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gieck v. Sigmond et al
as 3:2007cv01734
Plaintiff:
Dennis Michael Gieck
Defendant:
Rita Sigmond, Alberto Lopez, Seleaina Ann Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Velasquez v. Barrios et al
as 3:2007cv01130
Plaintiff:
David Velasquez
Defendant:
A Barrios, C Grey, C Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcial et al v. Palomar Pomerado Health System et al
as 3:2007cv01221
Plaintiff:
Alma Yolanda Marcial and Jaime A. Garcia
Defendant:
Palomar Pomerado Health System, Palomar Medical Center, Palomar Pomerado Health and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Levine v. Bic USA Inc et al
as 3:2007cv01096
Plaintiff:
Kevin T Levine
Defendant:
Bic USA Inc and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Moran v. Levin et al
as 3:2007cv01020
Plaintiff:
Nicolas Moran
Defendant:
M Levin, Frank B Flint, Pablo Chan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
