Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Curlis v. Life Insurance Company of North America et al
as 3:2015cv01123
Plaintiff:
Cindy L. Curlis
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America, Cricket Communications, Inc. Long-Term Disability Plan, Cricket Communications, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Gutierrez v. Enterprise
as 3:2015cv00868
Plaintiff:
Cindy Gutierrez
Defendant:
Enterprise
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Gutierrez v. Hertz Corp.
as 3:2015cv00867
Plaintiff:
Cindy Gutierrez
Defendant:
Hertz Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0241
Vaughn v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
as 3:2014cv00223
Plaintiff:
Cindy Vaughn
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gilbert et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 3:2014cv00190
Plaintiff:
Gary Gilbert and Cindy Gilbert
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
A & J Properties, LP v. Kurtz et al
as 3:2013cv00971
Plaintiff:
A & J Properties, LP
Defendant:
Cindy Kurtz , Gary Kurtz and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Carreon v. Davis et al
as 3:2011cv01446
Plaintiff:
Ramon Carreon
Defendant:
Jeff Davis, Cindy Loftus and Pedro Castillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Pridgeon
as 3:2011cv00066
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Cindy Pridgeon
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Fullecido-Reyno et al v. Fannie Mae Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv01899
Plaintiff:
June Fullecido-Reyno, Freddie Reyno and JFW Adult Residential Care
Claimant:
David Wynn-Miller
Defendant:
Fannie Mae Corporation , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc, MERS Corp and others
Petitioner:
Sand Canyon Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
