Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Lane et al v. Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01367
Plaintiff:
Judy Lane and Pepper Lane
Defendant:
Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. and Does I-XX, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hosley et al v. National Pygmy Goat Association et al
as 3:2014cv00290
Plaintiff:
Debra Hosley , Amber Waves , Donna Elkins and others
Defendant:
National Pygmy Goat Association and Does 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Lane-Schreiber v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
as 3:2014cv00147
Plaintiff:
Pamela Lane-Schreiber
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Directv, LLC v. Lane, et al
as 3:2013cv02586
Plaintiff:
Directv, LLC
Defendant:
Robert K. Lane, David M. Schiffman, Vania C. Raitano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lane v. Asset Acceptance, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv01931
Plaintiff:
William Lane
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance, LLC and Fulton Friedman & Gullace, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Reyes et al v. San Diego Properties Acquisition & Development LLC et al
as 3:2013cv01327
Plaintiff:
Dorindia E. Reyes and Dorindia Yost
Defendant:
San Diego Properties Acquisition & Development LLC, Barrow Falls Corp. and Robert Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Wright v. Cuevas et al
as 3:2012cv02454
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lane Wright
Defendant:
Cuevas, Diggs, Strowser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2012cv02332
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lane Wright
Defendant:
Jane or John Doe 1, Jane or John Doe 2 and Jane or John Doe 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shalov v. Muhich et al
as 3:2012cv02131
Plaintiff:
Susan Shalov
Defendant:
John Muhich, Andy Muhich, Mark Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Tyson v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. et al
as 3:2012cv00593
Plaintiff:
Randall Tyson
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank N.A. , NDEx West LLC , Ross M. Klein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
