Cases 51 - 60 of 135
Robinson v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv00703
Plaintiff:
Curtis Anthony Robinson
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Robinson v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
as 3:2015cv00194
Plaintiff:
Joyce Robinson
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abalos v. Stanley et al
as 3:2015cv00139
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Abalos
Defendant:
Daniel Stanley, Mario Perez, Brandon Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
eCapital, LLC v. Kitto, Saldivar & Robinson LLP et al
as 3:2015cv00043
Plaintiff:
eCapital, LLC
Defendant:
Kitto, Saldivar & Robinson LLP, Jonathan Kitto and Jose Alonso Saldivar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez v. Robinson et al
as 3:2014cv02770
Plaintiff:
Pedro Luis Rodriguez
Defendant:
Wood Robinson and Contractors State License Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Imagenetix, Inc. v. Robinson Pharma, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv02557
Plaintiff:
Imagenetix, Inc.
Defendant:
Robinson Pharma, Inc., Doctor's Clinical, Inc., Gero Vita, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Johnson et al v. McKesson Corporation
as 3:2014cv02070
Plaintiff:
Louis Johnson , Ruth Suyama-Kim , Aileen Segerstrom and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. , Novo Nordisk Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
eCapital, LLC v. Kitto, Saldivar & Robinson LLP et al
as 3:2014cv01827
Plaintiff:
eCapital, LLC
Defendant:
Kitto, Saldivar & Robinson LLP, Jonathan Kitto, Jose Alonso Saldivar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Johnson et al v. McKesson Corporation
as 3:2014cv01098
Plaintiff:
Louis Johnson , Ruth Suyama-Kim , Dean Johnson and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. , Amylin Pharmaceuticals, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
