Cases 61 - 70 of 83
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Gutierrez-Medina
as 3:2011cv01716
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc.
Defendant:
Antonio Gutierrez-Medina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Gutierrez Medina
as 3:2011cv01678
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Anthony Gutierrez Medina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Medina-Martinez v. USA
as 3:2011cv01597
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Mauro Armando Medina-Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Medina
as 3:2011cv00980
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Antonio Gutierrez Medina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blucher et al v. Piccolo et al
as 3:2010cv01638
Plaintiff:
Claudia Jo Gorham, James Buch, Michael Ranieri and others
Defendant:
Five Star Capital Markets, LLC, Jim Piccolo, DOES 1-50; inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pr
Medina et al v. GC Services, LP
as 3:2010cv00651
Plaintiff:
Alma Medina and Teresa Durgin
Defendant:
GC Services, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gonzalez-Medina v. USA
as 3:2010cv00204
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Angel Mario Gonzalez-Medina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Medina v. Hernandez
as 3:2009cv01861
Petitioner:
Raymond Medina
Respondent:
R Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medina et al v. ETS Services, LLC et al
as 3:2009cv00889
Plaintiff:
Javier P. Medina and Emma L. Medina
Defendant:
ETS Services, LLC, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Argent Mortgage Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Medina v. Morris et al
as 3:2009cv00169
Plaintiff:
Ray Medina
Defendant:
B Morris, S Garcia, D K McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
