Cases 11 - 20 of 146
Stevins v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 2:2022cv00154
Plaintiff:
Attorney Samantha Stevins and Samantha Stevins
Defendant:
US Bank National Association, James E. Albertelli, P.A., d/b/a Albertelli Law, Nationstar Mortgage, LLC d/b/a Mr. Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Tong v. Bank of America Corporation
as 3:2021cv01252
Plaintiff:
ANDY TONG
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Tong v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 3:2021cv01236
Plaintiff:
ANDY TONG
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, NA and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Patten v. Lown
as 2:2020cv00605
Defendant:
Christina M. Lown
Plaintiff:
Barrington R Patten
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1972
Steven L. Steward & Associates, P.A. v. Truist Bank et al
as 6:2020cv01083
Plaintiff:
Steven L. Steward & Associates, P.A.
Defendant:
Truist Bank and Truist Financial Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Risdon v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 8:2020cv01445
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Risdon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Schmidt v. Fifth Third Bank, National Association
as 8:2019cv00763
Defendant:
FIFTH THIRD BANK N.A., Fifth Third Bank and Fifth Third Bank, National Association
Plaintiff:
Terrence Schmidt
Not Classified By Court:
Karimu F. Hill-Harvey
Murph v. GTE Federal Credit Union
as 8:2020cv00447
Defendant:
GTE Federal Credit Union d/b/a GTE Financial and GTE Federal Credit Union
Plaintiff:
Keith Murph
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Mayflower Transport, LLC v. Frey
as 6:2019cv01993
Defendant:
William Frey
Plaintiff:
Mayflower Transport, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Poulton et al
as 3:2019cv01117
Defendant:
Nicholas Poulton, Deborah McMullan Poulton, James Alexander Poulton and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
