Cases 41 - 50 of 154
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv02690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
LaCount v. Mendoza et al
as 6:2021cv01878
Plaintiff:
Damien M. LaCount
Defendant:
Angel Mendoza, Arthur Sheppard, Orange County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00776
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Navy Seal 1 et al v. Austin et al
as 8:2021cv02429
Plaintiff:
Navy Seal 1, Navy Seal 2, EOD Officer and others
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Lloyd Austin, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Interested Party:
Andrew L. Guthart
Not Classified By Court:
Anthony E. Porcelli
Petitioner:
Thomas More Macik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Pisano v. Florida Dept. of Law Enforcement et al
as 8:2021cv02058
Plaintiff:
Louis Pisano
Defendant:
Florida Dept. of Law Enforcement and Michael Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Partap v. Palmer's Garden and Goods et al
as 6:2021cv01023
Defendant:
Andrew Commins, Jeff Palmer and Palmer's Garden and Goods
Plaintiff:
Elena Partap
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01010
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Naster v. Quintal et al
as 6:2021cv00742
Defendant:
Virgil Quintal, Andrew Salazar and Brian Stoll
Plaintiff:
Blaine Alan Naster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Bailey et al
as 5:2021cv00158
Defendant:
Dana Remus, Tammy A Whitcomb, Rodney Edward Amick and others
Plaintiff:
Jason David Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sloben v. Hillsborough County State Attorney's Office et al
as 8:2021cv00672
Defendant:
John Rocco Pace, Frances M. Perrone, Hillsborough County State Attorney's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Jay Andrew Sloben
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
