Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Fantel v. Department Homeland Security et al
as 3:2024cv00594
Plaintiff:
C. John Fantel
Defendant:
Department Homeland Security, State of Rhode Island, Boston Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Fantel v. Handley et al
as 3:2024cv00545
Plaintiff:
C. John Fantel
Defendant:
Jeremy Handley, Stacey O'Neil, Joseph H. Nguyen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Other:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Hope et al v. City of Ocala, Florida et al
as 5:2023cv00606
Plaintiff:
Sterling Hope, III and Bonnie Hope
Defendant:
City of Ocala, Florida and Natawi Chin
Not Classified By Court:
Donna Doyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Seaman v. Fleurjean et al
as 8:2023cv01060
Plaintiff:
Donna Ann Seaman
Defendant:
Marc Fleurjean, Jonathan Morales, Christopher Covey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sharp v. Brown et al
as 3:2022cv00959
Plaintiff:
Timothy Sharp
Defendant:
Donna Brown and Cord Byrd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooper v. Patronis et al
as 8:2022cv01331
Plaintiff:
Donna Cooper
Defendant:
Jimmy Patronis and Michael Warner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00385
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Sheldon v. Golden Sheldon et al
as 8:2020cv02526
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Sarasota Sheriff's Department, De Facto Sarasota Leadership and others
Plaintiff:
Steve Sheldon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
