Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Johnson v. Mansukkani et al
as 5:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Davante Johnson
Defendant:
FNU Mansukkani, FNU Harr, FNU Barry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dustin v. Palmer et al
as 3:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Danny Richard Dustin
Defendant:
Charity Palmer, Ashley Terry, Melissa Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Cook et al
as 5:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Hasan H. Johnson
Defendant:
FNU Cook, FNU Shinn, FNU Bostic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Owens, Jr. v. Crews et al
as 3:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Albert T. Owens, Jr.
Defendant:
C. Lane, C. Crews, A. Figueroa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Albert T. Owens, Jr.
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, R. Polk, Barns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smitherman v. Quaintance et al
as 2:2023cv01185
Plaintiff:
Terrance Smitherman
Defendant:
Joshua Quaintance, Elijah Cook, James Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Dixon, et al
as 3:2023cv01312
Plaintiff:
Howard Jones, IV
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Cook, J Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (St. Johns)
as 3:2023cv00711
Petitioner:
Charles W. Cook and Charles W. Cook, III
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dustin v. Terry et al
as 3:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
Danny Richard Dustin
Defendant:
Ashley Terry, Michelle Cook, Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trapp v. Cooks et al
as 3:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
Craig Trapp
Defendant:
Cooks, Bucci and Dr. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
