Cases 1 - 10 of 26
MacDonald v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Jason MacDonald
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Attorney General, State of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chalifoux v. Mendoza et al
as 3:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Shawn Michael Chalifoux
Defendant:
Carlos Eduardo Mendoza and Leslie Hoffman Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Grimage v. Levai et al
as 3:2023cv00893
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Grimage
Defendant:
Captain Levai, Sergeant Hoffman and Sergeant Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherman v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00663
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jamal Sherman, Jr.
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Hoffman, Christina Crews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schock v. Hoffman et al
as 8:2023cv00512
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Arnold Schock
Defendant:
Kurt A. Hoffman and Punthika Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parkin v. Naphcare, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv02715
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Mitchell Parkin
Defendant:
Naphcare, Inc., Kurt Hoffman and Brian Meinberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parkin v. Hoffman et al
as 8:2022cv02265
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Mitchell Parkin
Defendant:
Kurt Hoffman, K. Shope and Kevin Kuchar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parkin v. Hoffman
as 8:2022cv02266
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Mitchell Parkin
Defendant:
Kurt Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parkin v. Hoffman
as 8:2022cv02045
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Mitchell Parkin
Defendant:
Kurt Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leahy v. Hoffman (Sarasota County)
as 8:2022cv02461
Petitioner:
Jesse Byron Leahy
Respondent:
Kurt A. Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
