Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Oscar v. FCC Coleman II USP et al
as 5:2022cv00233
Plaintiff:
Jean Erole Oscar and ZB
Defendant:
FCC Coleman II USP, FNU Kasmuke, United States of America and others
Respondent:
FNU Wegner and FNU Clemens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Champ v. Hendry County Board of County Commissioners, Florida et al
as 2:2019cv00264
Defendant:
Mitchell Wills, Carson Turner, Michael Swindle and others
Plaintiff:
Sean Phillip Champ and Inmates of Hendry County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Champ et al v. Hendry County Board of Commissioners et al
as 2:2019cv00218
Defendant:
Mitchell Wills, Carson Turner, Michael Swindle and others
Plaintiff:
Sean Phillip Champ and Inmates of Hendry County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGrady v. Thompson et al
as 3:2017cv00981
Plaintiff:
Christopher McGrady
Defendant:
S. Thompson, R. Brown, C. Wille Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rabonne v. U.S. Government et al
as 5:2017cv00319
Plaintiff:
Paco T. Rabonne
Defendant:
U.S. Government, Charles Lockett, Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wills v. United States of America et al
as 5:2015cv00127
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wills
Defendant:
United States of America and Mr. Commaneiro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wills v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2013cv00002
Petitioner:
Christopher Wills
Defendant:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wills v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2010cv00009
Petitioner:
Charles Wills
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wills v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 5:2008cv00480
Petitioner:
Teresa Lynn Wills
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
