Cases 11 - 20 of 169
Rushing v. Williamson et al
as 8:2022cv02817
Plaintiff:
Carla Laverne Rushing
Defendant:
Rachelle Williamson, Douglas Roberts, Neil Whiteman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cogdell v. Neil
as 3:2022cv01029
Plaintiff:
Carlos Cogdell
Defendant:
Neil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parrish v. Gentile et al
as 8:2022cv01863
Plaintiff:
William Parrish
Defendant:
Neil Gentile and Steven Derolf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Circle K Stores, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00787
Plaintiff:
Neil Alexander
Defendant:
Circle K Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Rushing v. Salaman et al
as 8:2022cv01143
Plaintiff:
Carla L. Rushing
Defendant:
Krystal Salaman, Ashley Blue, Douglas Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
1400606 Ontario, Ltd et al v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv00294
Plaintiff:
1400606 Ontario, Ltd, Neil Cousins and Ward Seymour
Defendant:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Winchester Global Trust Company Limited v. Masters et al
as 2:2022cv00189
Plaintiff:
Winchester Global Trust Company Limited
Defendant:
Darren Neil Masters, SN-SCP, LLC, CW Financial Consulting LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Gillespie v. Marion County Jail
as 5:2022cv00037
Petitioner:
Neil Joseph Gillespie
Respondent:
Marion County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gillespie v. Woods
as 5:2022cv00013
Petitioner:
Neil Joseph Gillespie
Respondent:
Billy Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
