Cases 21 - 30 of 69
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00385
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HARRIS v. GEICO et al
as 3:2018cv01300
Respondent:
KATIE ROSS, GEICO and DAREK CLYDE ADAMS ESTATE
Petitioner:
JOHN W HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Holliday v. Markel Syndicate 3000 at Underwriters at Lloyds
as 8:2018cv01327
Plaintiff:
Clyde J. Holliday, III
Defendant:
Markel Syndicate 3000 at Underwriters at Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bey v. State of Florida et al
as 3:2018cv00503
Plaintiff:
Asad Hajur Bey
Defendant:
State of Florida, Clyde Wolfe, Brandon Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holliday v. Syndicate 3000 at Lloyds, London
as 8:2017cv02063
Plaintiff:
Clyde J. Holliday, III
Defendant:
Syndicate 3000 at Lloyds, London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. United States of America
as 8:2016cv01881
Plaintiff:
Clyde Bernard Johnson, II
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sabal Trail Transmission, LLC v. .834 Acres of Land in Suwannee County Florida et al
as 3:2016cv00303
Plaintiff:
Sabal Trail Transmission, LLC
Defendant:
.834 Acres of Land in Suwannee County Florida, Clyde Bass Family Limited Partnership and Unknown Owners
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0717
Thompson v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
as 5:2015cv00345
Petitioner:
Clyde Scott Thompson
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Roberts & Schaefer Company v. Clyde Bergemann Delta Ducon, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00664
Plaintiff:
Roberts & Schaefer Company
Defendant:
Clyde Bergemann Delta Ducon, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Clyde Bergemann Delta Ducon, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Roberts & Schaefer Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
