Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Notz v. The United States Government et al
as 5:2014cv00557
Plaintiff:
Arthur M. Notz, III
Defendant:
The United States Government, The F.B.I., Richard Dent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. United States Government
as 6:2014cv01171
Plaintiff:
John D. King
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Notz v. United States Government
as 5:2014cv00386
Plaintiff:
Arthur M. Notz, III
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andreakos v. Department of Interior of the United States et al
as 8:2013cv03098
Plaintiff:
Earl Stelios Andreakos
Defendant:
Department of Interior of the United States, USA and Executive Branch of United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Notz v. United States Government
as 5:2013cv00313
Plaintiff:
Arthur M. Notz, III
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Espinosa v. United States Government et al
as 8:2012cv02818
Plaintiff:
Manuel E. Espinosa
Defendant:
United States Government, Commonwealth of Kentucky and Louisville Metro Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv02491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Randolph v. Obama et al
as 3:2011cv00928
Plaintiff:
Kelda K. Randolph
Defendant:
Barack Obama, George W. Bush, Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sgro v. United States Government
as 6:2009cv01793
Plaintiff:
Michael Louis Sgro
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv00854
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Petition to Quiet Title
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
