Cases 41 - 50 of 223
Gomez v. Tapestry, Inc.
as 8:2022cv02164
Plaintiff:
Marissa Gomez
Defendant:
Tapestry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Gomez v. MMM Consumer Brands Inc.
as 8:2022cv02005
Plaintiff:
Marissa Gomez
Defendant:
MMM Consumer Brands Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1711 Class Action Fairness Act of 2005
Gomez v. Solar-Ray, Inc.
as 6:2022cv01330
Plaintiff:
Lady Gomez
Defendant:
Solar-Ray, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Gomez v. Hays Worldwide Studios, Inc.
as 6:2022cv00988
Plaintiff:
Tania Gomez
Defendant:
Hays Worldwide Studios, Inc. and Paula Michaels
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gomez v. Crews et al
as 3:2022cv00387
Plaintiff:
Maximo Gomez
Defendant:
Asst. Warden C. Crews, J. I. Minshew, Sgt. B. R. Clemens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. Krushimi Two, LLC
as 8:2022cv00775
Plaintiff:
Jesus Gomez
Defendant:
KRUSHIMI TWO LLC and Krushimi Two, LLC doing business as Hungry Howie's Pizza
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wilshire Insurance Company v. Zeta Jax, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00271
Plaintiff:
Wilshire Insurance Company
Defendant:
Zeta Jax, Inc., Julio Gomez and Zeta Jax, Inc. doing business as Ruby Beach Brewing Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Gomez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
Albert John Gomez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv02841
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
