Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Hooker v. Moody
as 8:2014cv01090
Plaintiff: Carlton Hooker
Defendant: James S. Moody, Jr. and Jeffrey S. Downing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooker v. Shinseki We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2014cv00344
Plaintiff: Carlton Eugene Hooker, Jr.
Defendant: Eric K. Shinseki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2014cv00333
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hooker v. Shogren et al
as 8:2013cv01655
Plaintiff: Carlton Eugene Hooker, Jr.
Defendant: Robert C. Shogren , Lionel Barela and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2012cv02759
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2011cv01230
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hooker v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2008cv01058
Petitioner: Jason Tylon Scott Hooker
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wendt, et al v. Dow Chemical Company, et al
as 6:2001cv00680
Defendant: Exxon Chemical Company Division of Exxon Mobil Corp., Imperial Chemical Industries, Upaco Adhesives, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Ona Wendt, Dawn Ackerman, Harold Ackerman and others
Not Classified By Court: Terrence M. White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?