Cases 41 - 50 of 92
Parker v. BR Foods, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv01542
Plaintiff:
Elisha Parker
Defendant:
BR Foods, Inc. and Otis & Friends, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Ironworkers Local 397 Pension Fund et al
as 8:2014cv00308
Plaintiff:
Ironworkers Local 397 Pension Fund , Richard Gallo , H. Preston Taylor and others
Defendant:
Pan American Hydrogen, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Ironworkers Local 397 Pension Fund et al
as 8:2014cv00111
Plaintiff:
Ironworkers Local 397 Pension Fund , Richard Gallo , H. Preston Taylor and others
Defendant:
Certified Industrial Maintenance Welding & Fabrication, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Martin v. United States of America
as 8:2013cv02317
Plaintiff:
Otis Fred Martin
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Blaxton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv00756
Plaintiff:
Otis Blaxton
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Kenneth J. Plante
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blaxton v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 3:2013cv00634
Plaintiff:
Otis Blaxton and Pro Earth
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. USA
as 6:2013cv00720
Petitioner:
Otis Alex Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Blaxton v. Perry et al
as 8:2012cv02907
Defendant:
Daniel L. Perry, Denise Pompinio, Robert Melton and others
Plaintiff:
Otis Blaxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blaxton v. Robertson et al
as 3:2012cv01359
Plaintiff:
Otis Blaxton
Defendant:
Robertson, Martin, Hanna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timmons v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2012cv00672
Petitioner:
Otis Timmons
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
