Cases 41 - 50 of 150
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv02440
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Claudio Lozada v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2020cv01734
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and United States Attorney
Plaintiff:
Eliezer Claudio Lozada
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Vaz v. United States Attorney General et al
as 3:2020cv00820
Petitioner:
Damian J. Vaz
Respondent:
United States Attorney General and John Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv01258
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Brown v. United States of America
as 3:2020cv00661
Respondent:
United States of America, Baker County Detention Center, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Petitioner:
Lloyd Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Constantduval v. Barr
as 3:2020cv00630
Defendant:
United State Attorney William P Barr
Plaintiff:
Christian Constantduval
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aguilar v. United States Attorney General et al
as 5:2020cv00270
Defendant:
J. Phelps, M.D. Carvajal and United States Attorney General
Plaintiff:
Emilio Aguilar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stahlman v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 6:2020cv00733
Plaintiff:
John David Stahlman
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, United States Attorneys Executive Off. and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Elliott v. Carajal et al
as 8:2020cv00909
Plaintiff:
James R. Elliott
Defendant:
M.D. Carajal, Custodian of USP Coleman II and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elliott v. Carajal et al
as 5:2020cv00163
Plaintiff:
James R. Elliott
Defendant:
M.D. Carajal, Custodian of USP Coleman II and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
