Cases 51 - 60 of 84
Carr et al v. Wright National Flood Insurance Company
as 3:2013cv01215
Plaintiff:
Michael Carr and Cheryl Carr
Defendant:
Wright National Flood Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4001
Chicago Insurance Company v. Farr, Farr, Emerich, Hackett & Carr, P.A. et al
as 2:2013cv00577
Plaintiff:
Chicago Insurance Company
Defendant:
Farr, Farr, Emerich, Hackett & Carr, P.A., Darol H.M. Carr, Jack O. Hackett, II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv01889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Carr v. Insight Creative Landscapes et al
as 2:2013cv00006
Plaintiff:
Gary Carr
Defendant:
Insight Creative Landscapes and Tim Verwiebe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Carr v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2012cv02238
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Carr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Derrig v. The City of Marco Island, Florida et al
as 2:2012cv00464
Plaintiff:
John Derrig
Defendant:
The City of Marco Island, Florida and Thomas Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Challenge Program et al
as 5:2012cv00465
Plaintiff:
Luther Ray, Jr.
Defendant:
Challenge Program, Aliesha Carr and FNU O'Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carrs et al v. City of Melbourne
as 6:2012cv00480
Plaintiff:
Patrick S. Carrs, Jr. and Tami Henry
Defendant:
City of Melbourne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv00411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
