Cases 51 - 60 of 87
Goldsmith v. McNeil et al
as 3:2009cv00646
Petitioner:
Kenneth Goldsmith
Respondent:
Walter A. McNeil and Attorney General for the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CARTER v. MCNEIL
as 3:2009cv00628
Petitioner:
RAYMOND J CARTER
Respondent:
WALTER A MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brazill v. McNeil et al
as 2:2009cv00415
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel R. Brazill
Defendant:
Walter A. McNeil, Robert C. Joens, Beth E. Cowart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. McNeil et al
as 3:2009cv00580
Petitioner:
Ronald Palmer Heath
Respondent:
Walter A. McNeil and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. McNeil et al
as 3:2009cv00554
Petitioner:
Thiamond King
Respondent:
Walter A. McNeil and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. McNeil et al
as 3:2009cv00528
Petitioner:
Reginald E. Jones
Respondent:
Walter A. McNeil and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schlicher v. McNeil et al
as 3:2009cv00489
Plaintiff:
Gregory H. Schlicher
Defendant:
Walter A. McNeil, Page A. Smith, John Doe, I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMPSON v. MCNEIL
as 3:2009cv00474
Petitioner:
CURTIS A SIMPSON
Respondent:
WALTER A MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Floyd v. McNeil et al
as 3:2009cv00447
Plaintiff:
Glen Floyd
Defendant:
Walter A. McNeil, Randall Bryant and Marvin Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Hicks et al
as 3:2009cv00403
Plaintiff:
Joy Perry
Defendant:
Milton Hicks, Randall Bryant, Brian Riedl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
