Cases 81 - 90 of 121
Medina v. Matthew's Lawn Service, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv00104
Plaintiff:
Emilio Medina
Defendant:
Matthew's Lawn Service, Inc. and Matthew Murray
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cardoso v. The Law Offices of Omar F. Medina, Professional Association et al
as 8:2013cv01872
Plaintiff:
Ana M. Cardoso
Defendant:
The Law Offices of Omar F. Medina, Professional Association and Omar F. Medina, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Norsworthy v. Jacksonville Sheriff John H. Rutherford et al
as 3:2013cv00770
Plaintiff:
Henry L. Norsworthy
Defendant:
Jacksonville Sheriff John H. Rutherford, Officer S.T. Stevenson and Officer M.R. Medina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Seltz v. Medina et al
as 2:2013cv00394
Plaintiff:
Jason Seltz
Defendant:
Maylee Medina, Cheryl Hastings, Children's Advocacy Center of Collier County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Orjuela-Medina v. USA
as 8:2013cv00540
Defendant:
USA
Plaintiff:
Henry Orjuela-Medina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Barrios v. Trident Hospitality (Florida), LLC et al
as 6:2013cv00236
Plaintiff:
Jeyson Medina Barrios
Defendant:
Trident Hospitality (Florida), LLC and Shirish Doolabh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Orjuela-Medina v. USA
as 8:2013cv00378
Plaintiff:
Henry Orjuela-Medina
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Medina v. United States of America
as 6:2012cv01904
Petitioner:
Francisco Medina
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Medina v. United States of America
as 6:2012cv01829
Petitioner:
Francisco Medina
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
