Cases 1 - 10 of 128
Gates v. Cherri et al
as 2:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
William A. Gates, Jr.
Defendant:
Sargeant Cherri, Sargeant Ceazar, Sargeant L. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Warden Carlton
as 8:2024cv00528
Petitioner:
Jeriton Lavar Curry
Respondent:
Warden Carlton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Curry v. Fidelity National Financial, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01508
Plaintiff:
Christine Curry
Defendant:
Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and LoanCare, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Curry v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv01417
Plaintiff:
Samantha Lanette Curry
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Curry v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
as 5:2023cv00583
Petitioner:
Jeriton Lavar Curry
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wagner v. FU HWA III LC et al
as 6:2023cv01456
Plaintiff:
Tavia Wagner
Defendant:
FU HWA III LC and Piper's Bar & Grill LLC doing business as Graffiti Junktion Curry Ford
Curry v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Polk County)
as 8:2023cv01470
Petitioner:
Runnell Deshay Curry
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Chau v. Norris et al
as 8:2023cv01273
Defendant:
Detective Jonathan Norris, Blake and Detective Richard Curry, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Cuong Man Chau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 5:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
David P Curry
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
