Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Unites States of America v. Michel et al
as 6:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
United States of America (IRS)
Defendant:
Melissa P. Michel, Francis A. Michel III, Bank of America Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6502 IRS:Enforcement of tax liens
MAH Advising PLLC v. M&T Bank Corporation et al
as 8:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
MAH Advising PLLC
Defendant:
M&T Bank Corporation doing business as Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company/M&T Bank, Jill Zanghi and Laurie Risell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Parker v. Clearpath Lending et al
as 3:2023cv01437
Plaintiff:
Natosha L. Parker
Defendant:
Clearpath Lending, US Bank, NA, M&T Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Mace v. M&T Bank
as 2:2020cv00591
Defendant:
M&T Bank
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Mace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00437
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Byrd et al v. M&T Bank Corporation et al
as 6:2018cv01809
Defendant:
M&T Bank Corporation, DeLuca Law Group PLLC and Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC
Plaintiff:
Raymond L. Byrd and Belinda P. Byrd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Collelo v. M&T Bank Corporation
as 8:2016cv00225
Plaintiff:
Antoinette Collelo
Defendant:
M&T Bank Corporation
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv02296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bodmann et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association et al
as 8:2014cv01884
Plaintiff:
James Bodmann and Lucille Bodmann
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, M & T Bank Corporation and Bayview Loan Servicing LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
