Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Wingfield v. Warden, FCC Coleman-1
as 5:2023cv00562
Petitioner:
James H Wingfield and James H. Wingfield
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wingfield v. Warden, USP Coleman 1
as 5:2023cv00506
Petitioner:
James Wingfield
Respondent:
Warden, USP Coleman 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wingfield v. Harr et al
as 5:2023cv00504
Plaintiff:
James Wingfield
Defendant:
FNU Harr, FNU Bolstick, FNU Withers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wingfield v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2021cv02377
Plaintiff:
Gary Wingfield
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Taylor v. Ginn & Patrou, P.A. et al
as 3:2017cv00559
Plaintiff:
Mark Taylor
Defendant:
Ginn & Patrou, P.A. and Gables at Wingfield Townhomes Owners Association, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Davis v. Ford et al
as 6:2015cv01118
Plaintiff:
Sorrell Davis
Defendant:
Mattie Ford, Pile Wingfield, Sakina Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WIngfield v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2014cv00199
Petitioner:
Kenneth Wingfield
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
United States of America, ex rel. et al v. Tai Shan Golden Gain Aluminum Products, Ltd. et al
as 3:2011cv00368
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel. and James F. Valenti Jr.
Defendant:
Tai Shan Golden Gain Aluminum Products, Ltd., Sam Lei, John Lei and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Wingfield v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2013cv01188
Plaintiff:
Willie J. Wingfield
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2009cv01090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
