Cases 11 - 20 of 24
JONES v. HINSON et al
as 4:2015cv00105
Plaintiff:
RONALD DAVID JONES
Defendant:
ERIC F HINSON, V HELMS, JR, ISAAC SIMMONS, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VANDERHALL et al v. HAYWOOD
as 3:2015cv00062
Plaintiff:
TYRONE VANDERHALL and JEFFREY BRADSTOCK
Defendant:
ASHTON HAYWOOD, CHIP W SIMMONS, PC WU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARGNARE v. SHACKELFORD
as 3:2014cv00437
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE ALLEN BARGNARE
Defendant:
JAN SHACKELFORD, WILLIAM BILL EDDINS, MATT GORDON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARGNARE v. SHACKELFORD
as 3:2014cv00438
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE BARGNARE
Defendant:
JAN SHACKELFORD, WILLIAM BILL EDDINS, MATT GORDON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SIMMONS v. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2014cv00072
Plaintiff:
GABRIELE ADRIAN SIMMONS
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
HARPER v. FLORIDA BAR et al
as 4:2013cv00459
Plaintiff:
DAVID A HARPER
Defendant:
JOANN MARIE STALCUP, FLORIDA SUPREME COURT, FLORIDA BAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OPENA v. MORGAN et al
as 3:2013cv00295
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA MICHAEL OPENA
Defendant:
DAVID MORGAN, REBECCA ANN SIMPSON , CHIP W SIMMONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
ADAMS v. CITY OF PENSACOLA FLORIDA et al
as 3:2012cv00580
Plaintiff:
BILL ADAMS
Defendant:
CITY OF PENSACOLA FLORIDA , CHIP SIMMONS and R EAGERTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DYSON v. PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC, et al
as 1:2011cv00134
Plaintiff:
RONNIE DYSON
Defendant:
PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC, PRE-PAID LEGAL CASUALTY INC, PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC OF FLORIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
