Cases 141 - 150 of 14,108
BEAGLES v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00093
Petitioner:
JOHNNY DALTON BEAGLES
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON and ASHLEY MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PETERS v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00094
Petitioner:
JEREMIE ODELL PETERS
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
EDWARD LEE BROWN
Respondent:
ASHLEY MOODY and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DOYON v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
RYAN R DOYON and RYAN ROBERT DOYON
Defendant:
MR RICKY DIXON, MR KEEN, TALLAHASSEE MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CASEY v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CASEY
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGLAUN v. DIXON
as 5:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
JOHN EDWARD MCGLAUN
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MONTGOMERY v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 3:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
JOHN W MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOPER v. DOE
as 4:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
JAMELL M COOPER
Defendant:
JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
LEONARD WAYNE TAYLOR
Respondent:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MILLER v. GRACEVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 5:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
WILLIS ARMANDO MILLER
Defendant:
GRACEVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
