Cases 21 - 30 of 474
PERRY v. WATSON et al
as 1:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
KEITH G PERRY
Defendant:
SHERIFF CLOVIS WATSON, JR, DETECTIVE TRAVIS E DEVINNY, DETECTIVE BEVERIDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRISON v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 5:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
DONALD L HARRISON
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and J E PRANTNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00304
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
GORAYA v. RYAN et al
as 4:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
KULTAR SINGH GORAYA
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, J RYAN, CENTURION HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIGUEZ v. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTY UNION et al
as 3:2023cv16482
Plaintiff:
DARIO M RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTY UNION, BABECOCK, BAGLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FAISON v. CORTES et al
as 4:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW LEO FAISON, MAESTRO FAISON and JAME FAISON
Defendant:
A CORTES, E HAND, S MCDONALD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLAKE v. SCHROCK et al
as 3:2023cv08552
Plaintiff:
KEVIN L BLAKE
Defendant:
SCHROCK, J DUNN, HARVEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLMES v. YOUNG et al
as 5:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
ERRICK HOLMES, JR
Defendant:
L J YOUNG, T STALL, MICHELLE A WITALEC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOWENS v. DUNS
as 3:2023cv07353
Petitioner:
E-YAGE BOWENS
Defendant:
DUNS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HAYNES v. BURNHAM et al
as 4:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY LORENZO HAYNES, JR
Defendant:
C BURNHAM, T LISTER, E MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
