Cases 1 - 10 of 388
SMITH v. MOODY
as 1:2024cv00165
Respondent:
ASHLEY MOODY
Petitioner:
VERON SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SULLIVAN v. SMITH et al
as 3:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
TREVOR JAMES SULLIVAN
Defendant:
MIKE RAMIREZ and PHILLIP SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TLUSTY v. ALEXANDER et al
as 5:2024cv00167
Defendant:
J ELLENBURG, JOHN AND JANE DOE, ALEXANDER and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JEFFREY TLUSTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BERGER v. SMITH et al
as 3:2024cv00350
Defendant:
D SMITH, JANE DOE #1, JOHN WILTZ and others
Plaintiff:
JACKIE BERGER, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATSON v. SMITH
as 3:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
TYSON N WATSON
Defendant:
AMANDA U SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. CENTURION OF FLORIDA LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
MELVIN BERNARD THOMPSON
Defendant:
CENTURION OF FLORIDA LLC, JASON THOMAS BRENES CATINCHI and JAQUELINE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HART v. DAVIS et al
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
RANDY A HART
Defendant:
S DAVIS, G ENGLISH, T DUDLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JETT v. SMITH et al
as 5:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
EARNEST JETT and EARNEST JETT, JR
Defendant:
J SMITH, CHRIS FEILDER, RYISNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. DOE et al
as 4:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SMITH
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and WAKULLA CI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KURTZ et al v. WILCOXS et al
as 1:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
T KURTZ doing business as T SHAY also known as T SCHUMACHER also known as T SHORT, T SCHUMACHER, T SHORT and others
Defendant:
WILCOXS, SNYDER, SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
