Cases 1 - 10 of 11
MUHAMMAD v. JONES et al
as 4:2015cv00284
Plaintiff:
AKEEM MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
JULIE L JONES , ALEX TAYLOR , MARVIN DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARCUS B HARRIS v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2014cv00575
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , BETH MALLARD , MICHAEL D CREWS and others
Plaintiff:
MARCUS B HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROWAN v. CREWS et al
as 4:2014cv00572
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E ROWAN
Defendant:
MICHAEL D CREWS, ALEX TAYLOR, D SCHEETZ, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPRINGS v. TAYLOR et al
as 4:2014cv00529
Defendant:
ALEX TAYLOR , MARVIN DAVIS and STEVEN SINGER
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS SPRINGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUHAMMAD v. CREWS et al
as 4:2014cv00379
Plaintiff:
AKEEM MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
MICHAEL D CREWS , JAMES R UPCHURCH , ALEX TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ABDULLAH v. SCOTT et al
as 1:2012cv00144
Plaintiff:
AMIR ISHMAEL ABDULLAH
Defendant:
RICK SCOTT, KENNETH TUCKER, TIMOTHY H CANNON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATKINS v. SCOTT, et al.,
as 4:2012cv00215
Plaintiff:
JOHN E WATKINS
Defendant:
RICK SCOTT, KENNETH TUCKER, EMANUEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATKINS, et al v. SCOTT, et al
as 4:2012cv00070
Plaintiff:
JOHN E WATKINS, EDWARD LEE MCCLOUD, OWEN DENSON and others
Defendant:
RICK SCOTT, KENNETH TUCKER, ALEX TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICH v. MCNEIL, et al
as 1:2010cv00157
Plaintiff:
BRUCE RICH
Defendant:
WALTER MCNEIL, MILTON HICKS, S T ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LINDSAY v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 5:2007cv00150
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER L LINDSAY
Defendant:
JAMES MCDONOUGH, ALEX TAYLOR and ROBERT JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
